Ivo Anjo

> @ivoanjo thanks! I will try it out today! Sounds like this issue can be closed then. I've been planning to close this ticket once we declare it as stable....

Hey folks! With the release of dd-trace-rb 1.21.1, we're officially marking allocation profiling as beta. We've been doing lots of validation and performance improvements, and are quite happy with the...

Please do let us know any feedback you have after trying this out /cc @dferramosi @ctrombley @tsub @alemr-roo @zarakay @voiski @ohookins @rafal42 @sushmithaeshwar ;)

Since this is already supported in the latest versions of the library, going ahead and closing this ticket. We're still very interested on any feedback y'all have on these features,...

Nothing to announce here yet, but it's interesting to see that github had a similar issue: https://github.blog/2022-04-11-performance-at-github-deferring-stats-with-rack-after_reply/

Should we make a decision on this PR? E.g. either explicitly merge it or close it?

A compilation failure caused by `malloc_stats` being missing is not expected at all, since the code is supposed to gracefully degrade when it's not available. @mintuhouse I noticed the log...

Hello there! Thanks for raising this :) Yes, we agree, very much! I believe it's definitely a question of when, not if, we'll add this. (I gave a [whole presentation...

> If I understand correctly, the idea would be to integrate here, and not rely on GVLTools, right? Yes. In fact the work in `GVLTools` is split between a number...

Do we want to make an explicit go/no-go decision on this one?