graphviz icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
graphviz copied to clipboard

allow `bytestring-0.11`, `fgl-5.8`, `hspec-2.10`

Open byorgey opened this issue 3 years ago • 14 comments

Seems to work fine (including the test suite) with no changes.

  • Updating bytestring is necessary to get graphviz to build with base-4.16 (GHC 9.2), because bytestring-0.10 does not allow base-4.16 and is unlikely to be updated.
  • In addition, the updates to fgl and hspec are needed to work with base-4.17 (GHC 9.4).

byorgey avatar Dec 30 '21 16:12 byorgey

(You could even just drop the upperbound completely.)

juhp avatar Mar 20 '22 06:03 juhp

A Hackage revision would be really helpful

juhp avatar Mar 20 '22 06:03 juhp

Could we have a Hackage revision, please?

cc @hackage-trustees

juhp avatar Apr 01 '22 10:04 juhp

Ping :)

juhp avatar Apr 30 '22 13:04 juhp

ping from me too :)

santiweight avatar May 05 '22 23:05 santiweight

As a Hackage trustee I made the appropriate revision: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/graphviz-2999.20.1.0/revisions/

Bodigrim avatar Aug 25 '22 22:08 Bodigrim

Just noting that graphviz is back in Stackage Nightly now

juhp avatar Aug 30 '22 05:08 juhp

@Bodigrim @hackage-trustees I've now also included updates to upper bounds for fgl and hspec in this PR to enable support GHC 9.4; could those also be revised on Hackage?

byorgey avatar Sep 28 '22 10:09 byorgey

@byorgey done in https://hackage.haskell.org/package/graphviz-2999.20.1.0/revisions/, but honestly this is not sustainable in a long term. If the package is unmaintained, please initiate a takeover.

Bodigrim avatar Sep 28 '22 21:09 Bodigrim

@Bodigrim thanks! And you're right of course. I'm not really interested in maintaining it personally, just trying to prod the ecosystem along a bit. But anyone else reading this who wants to try maintaining it, go for it!

byorgey avatar Sep 28 '22 21:09 byorgey

And one more revision: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/graphviz-2999.20.1.0/revisions/

Bodigrim avatar Aug 04 '23 19:08 Bodigrim

I would happily maintain this package, although I would probably just keep it building and review PRs.

Daniel-Diaz avatar Sep 18 '23 10:09 Daniel-Diaz

@Daniel-Diaz great! See the process here: https://wiki.haskell.org/Taking_over_a_package

byorgey avatar Sep 18 '23 10:09 byorgey

@Daniel-Diaz great! See the process here: https://wiki.haskell.org/Taking_over_a_package

Thank you. I will first try to contact him through his e-mail to see if I can be granted contributor access.

Daniel-Diaz avatar Sep 18 '23 11:09 Daniel-Diaz