iVAN

I see, but it doesn't seem like an intuitive enough method to me. In the sense that first of all I would have to download packages and recreate the structure...

> if this work could be done together with the application authors. this is the point, I want to grab their attention. If they finally relize that this kind of...

@probonopd I tried to package programs from Arch Linux using your tool, but it didn't work. Too many errors, especially if the binary files in /usr/bin had a .py extension...

ArchImage solves this issue https://github.com/ivan-hc/ArchImage The apps are built including JuNest, lightweight version of Arch Linux. This means that the app will work standalone, the minimal requirement of the host...

> Ma l'immagine dell'app JuNest è anche molto più grande, potrebbe essere gonfia. the AppImages with flag "junest" are something I call "ArchImages", i.e. Arch Linux into an Appimage https://github.com/ivan-hc/ArchImage...

> I am just wondering why both the Flatpak and your package are so way slower than this project, which poorly is discontinued. I think it is because they use...

@firefoxlover normally an AppImage must be compiled at least on the old and still supported Ubuntu LTS (now it is 18.04), due to GLIBC compatibility. A container, instead, can work...

@probonopd instead of cracking down on AppImage creators with restrictive rules, why not introduce a notification in AppImages to warn the user that "your system is too old"? After all,...

I'm not saying ignore schools and companies, I'm just saying that developers should be free to distribute packages however they like. Too many rules nobody likes. Also, at the level...

I know that AppImages can run on FreeBSD, but I've not tested ArchImages there. Thank you for the feedback. So I think this solution should be improved, that's why I...