dfish

> on-the-fly computation of the posterior through conjugacy I only gave the paper a cursory read, but arrived at a similar conclusion and wanted to wait for your evaluation. There...

@DominiqueMakowski, I think these ideas are all worthy of discussion and are not necessarily useless. Conjugate priors are quite convenient and have practical utility. So I think that is worth...

@DominiqueMakowski, thanks for the suggestions. I'll try to find time to read the paper for the RDEX in more detail. After a cursory read, it looks like it is applied...

The LCA is conceptually similar. I am not sure how or whether they might differ. A while back I started an implemention of the OUM, but I was unsure whether...

Thanks for sharing. Its been a while since I read that article. I agree that they are interesting ideas. One thing I remember is that some of the model fits...

I think it would be reasonable to add a model with an urgancy signal, especially if the physiological evidence is compelling. One reason I have not added such a model...

Good finds. I gave the trial-varying Wald model paper a cursory read a few months ago.

I think there are different ways to approach these types of models. Some time ago, Dominique made this [example](https://itsdfish.github.io/SequentialSamplingModels.jl/dev/turing_hierarchical/). Do you think there is an advantage of your approach?

FYI, you can simplify your code with `choices[i], rts[i] = rand(dist)`.

I understand the desire for such a function, but one problem with your proposal is that it is too restrictive for a package. From what I can tell, the function...