The templates used in reproducing the eval results: why adding the instruction again after "### Response: "?

[yucc-leon]

There is an input format mismatch between the eval and training process. Do you intend to emphasize the problem before the model generates its output?

When doing the Humaneval(+) eval, the compiled inputs are as follows, eg.:

@@ Instruction
Write a solution to the following problem:
```python
def fib(n: int):
    """Return n-th Fibonacci number.
    >>> fib(10)
    55
    >>> fib(1)
    1
    >>> fib(8)
    21
    """

@@ Response

def fib(n: int):
    """Return n-th Fibonacci number.
    >>> fib(10)
    55
    >>> fib(1)
    1
    >>> fib(8)
    21
    """```

But in the code files about data processing and training, the instruction data would be compiled as:

You are an exceptionally intelligent coding assistant that consistently delivers accurate and reliable responses to user instructions.

@@ Instruction Write a solution to the following coding problem: {problem}

@@ Response {response}

There is no such **_rephrasing/emphasizing_** in the training data of Magicoder. 
From the eval results this mismatch seems not to bring obvious negative effects, but did you deliberately do so?