isabel
Since the upstream package has been merged, I assume it has been fixed. Please do let me know if it works.
Just to reiterate my point from https://github.com/catppuccin/nix/pull/168#issuecomment-2111754109, such that everyone here can see it. > This seems like an issue you should take up with the upstream packager (nixpkgs). Since...
There was previously going to be a default, but I decided against it due to licencing. However that does not mean that one cannot be placed there, by PR or...
Just a note this did not work as I expected
I'd be happy to work on them, but seeing as you already have done alot of the work feel free to make a PR if you would prefer.
Been messing around, seems like its just changing the command name. Maybe the flags. Needs a bit more testing.
Below is a list of all my findings between the differences. I **heavily** suggest we stay with sassc for now. - The diff between rc3 and dart-sass, includes an incredible...
> We still need to figure out what the best approach to upstreaming these patches is. Let's label it for now so we can revisit it in the future. I...
> Should we make a secondary issue to track the upstream contribution? Seems like a good idea to me. > I don't think we should block our patch PRs on...
> > I assume this means anyone can contribute here or upstream? If so, we should mark PRs that are considered upstream patches and send it up ourselves, that should...