isabelle-dr

Thanks for opening this! There is another issue about a next iteration on the acceptance tests: #1076. This one isn't a duplicate, both flag different improvements to be made.

> How valuable do you think the comment is? I'd say pretty valuable, the initial idea was to have something user-friendly to see the impact of a PR, and how...

Also related: https://github.com/MobilityData/gtfs-validator/issues/1233

Hello Evan, Thanks for flagging this! This is super useful, having a reliable validation report is a top priority. 🙂 You are right, this field is considered _required_ in the...

Hi @dancesWithCycles , thanks for opening this issue! There have been discussions in #930 and #886 about the FeedExpirationDateNotice. We talked about having two different rules for the 7day and...

Labeling as blocked because this mention is not in the spec or best practices, and currently this validator doesn't include additional checks.

Hello @asvechnikov2, thanks for opening-up this discussion! The work in PR #1083 and discussions in issue #1070 were a lot 🙈. I would like to share additional context. Here is...

I also see the difference in how people use this validator, between what @derhuerst was saying: > the goal of this tool is to nudge agencies to provide better feeds,...

Hi @aababilov, thanks for this contribution! Just had a look and I'm not sure I understand what exactly we're doing with the identified HVT values. 🤔 What exactly will be...

I see, thanks for the clarification! I think it's great to build a structure that supports HVT values in the validator, since you're right, they're widely used. > Profiles are...