Sam Isaacson

@kaandocal looks cool. See also https://github.com/SciML/DiffEqJump.jl/pull/131 where we started on a direct interface to the Gillespie methods in a similar way (giving a graph and flattening it to a giant...

@kaandocal haven't forgotten about this or your other PR; was just a busy week. Blocking out time tomorrow afternoon to go through them carefully.

Advection could be simulated right now. The user needs to specify the hopping rates currently, so they would need to calculate what the advective transition rates for their model are....

I think there is a way to label documentation strings as a `doctest` and then when the docs are being built it tries running the code.

@ChrisRackauckas @TorkelE @korsbo The non-tutorial issues that we had listed here are now basically done aside from getting BCR back to where we were at before moving to MT. (@shashi...

If you add the conservation law to the generated ODEsystem does structural simplification then eliminate one of the ODEs?

Don't try to change an equation, just add the constraint as a new equation (i.e. push it onto `osys.eqs`) and then run `structural_simplify` to get a new system. Take look...

Here is a minimal example that doesn't work: ```julia using Catalyst, ModelingToolkit rn = @reaction_network begin k1, A+B --> C k2, C --> A + B end k1 k2 osys...

@YingboMa See above, where I asked "If you add the conservation law to the generated ODEsystem does structural simplification then eliminate one of the ODEs?" and Chris indicated that it...

What is your definition of a consistent ODE system? If I leave out the algebraic equation and just include the three ODEs is this system "not consistent" in your definition?