Add formatting as workflow (as requested)

[tobezdev]

This PR is not a domain creation request. Reference pull #13966

Version 2 of adding Prettier formatting to is-a-dev/register! New in this version:

• moved manual workflow to automatic:
  • [+] .github/workflows/formatting.yml - create the workflow
  • {~] package.json - added configuration for the formatter
  • [~] package-lock.json - added script to run formatting on-change
  • [+] .prettierrc - add configuration for formatting to run with
  • [+] .prettierignore - add a list of files for formatting to ignore

Please request changes on .prettierignore before merging this to ensure the formatter only edits the correct files. You may also want to check/test the workflow to ensure it runs as intended.

[tobezdev]

Sure @wdhdev, I'll do it later on today :)

[wdhdev]

Sure @wdhdev, I'll do it later on today :)

Have you done this yet? If so, please send me the action run.

[omsenjalia]

Sure @wdhdev, I'll do it later on today :)

Any updates?

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has been marked as stale due to inactivity and will be closed. Comment anything on this PR to prevent it

[iostpa]

@tobezdev Any updates?

[tobezdev]

Yes. I have managed to recreate the workflow on a private test repo. The formatting seemed to work fine, but I'm trying to troubleshoot a check failure (though it seems to work fine) I'll add another comment here when I find a fix to this.

[MaskDuck]

Yes. I have managed to recreate the workflow on a private test repo. The formatting seemed to work fine, but I'm trying to troubleshoot a check failure (though it seems to work fine) I'll add another comment here when I find a fix to this.

I tried. any nonzero exit code in any step will result in the failure of the check as a whole. (therefore stopping checks)

[iostpa]

Any updates?

[tobezdev]

Any updates?

Going to be completely honest with you, I completely forgot about the existence of this PR. I've been very busy with personal stuff, so apologies for that. Could someone remind me where we were with this? Thanks.

[iostpa]

Any updates?

Going to be completely honest with you, I completely forgot about the existence of this PR. I've been very busy with personal stuff, so apologies for that. Could someone remind me where we were with this? Thanks.

So from what I see, you were trying to troubleshoot a check failure, then MaskDuck tried out your workflow and pointed out that any nonzero exit code will result in the failure of the workflow as a flow, therefore stopping checks. That's the last update I've seen on this PR. If you have no idea on what I'm saying, you could read the 2 messages that I've summarized that are above my follow up or you can even check your repo to see what you did there the last time.

[wdhdev]

I'm going to go ahead and close this. I appreciate the efforts however it is too complicated and would require thorough review from our team which we do not have the resources for.