Ivan Pepelnjak
Ivan Pepelnjak
@jbemmel: * Did you manage to figure out what was causing the problem? * Was the VM "alive" (as in "you can connect to it with virsh console")? Did it...
Any progress? Shall we close this one?
Closing due to lack of progress/feedback
> Variant on this would be to specify a git url - have Netlab checkout the repo and launch the lab (assuming standard naming conventions) You're effectively saying "replicate this:...
> Variant on this would be to specify a git url - have Netlab checkout the repo and launch the lab (assuming standard naming conventions) This is now less pressing...
> Since this adds a new dependency, should we consider the more feature rich replacements for 'requests' like niquest or httpx? If anything, I'd go for something that might be...
> I'd like to see Netlab introduce a vendor agnostic state model, with focus on the bits that are required to reverse engineer a running network and generate a Netlab...
> Ooooh, that would be very useful! Especially when using netlab for training purposes to see where the students messed up :) You already use **netlab validate** to figure that...
> That's my point: Netlab has an abstraction layer for the configuration model, but not for the state model. Users are left to figure out which show commands to use,...
> I guess using a tool like SuzieQ could help? Netlab validation tests can already use SuzieQ: https://netlab.tools/topology/validate/#lab-validation-with-suzieq > I'm not too familiar with it, but with another tool kind...