rfcs

rfcs copied to clipboard

Enforce Boolean on SPSP receipts_enabled

1

Explicitly define in the spec what happens if it's truthy or falsey. i.e empty string.

AlexLakatos

Add Validation mechanism for SPSP

3

receipts_enabled shared_secret destination_account From @marcoscaceres: Would be nice if the SPSP has an algorithm to hook directly into for validation. And it returned true or false. So... "perform simple payment...

AlexLakatos

There are [two error codes](https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/blob/main/0023-bilateral-transfer-protocol/0023-bilateral-transfer-protocol.md#error-codes) that refer to `transferId` of packets/requests but in the specification but it seems what is meant is `Request ID`? Also in this context it would...

michielbdejong

The [stated motivation of BTP](https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/blob/main/0023-bilateral-transfer-protocol/0023-bilateral-transfer-protocol.md#motivation) is to be a [link-layer protocol](https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/blob/main/0001-interledger-architecture/0001-interledger-architecture.md#protocol-layers) like [ILP-over-HTTP](https://github.com/interledger/rfcs/blob/main/0035-ilp-over-http/0035-ilp-over-http.md) but using WebSockets instead of HTTP POST. I understand BTP has to be more complex than ILP-over-HTTP...

michielbdejong

Fixes #588

michielbdejong

michielbdejong

Documents: Include Deprecation Notes to Prevent Issues and Know User to Prevent Future Problems

Yashnandha

This fixes the ILDCP link on the "ILP Addresses" RFC.

MichaelKohler