Automatic CI Doc Build

[aepanchi]

Description

Enable automatic CI doc build once the main is updated. Propose a better version control solution. Output is available at https://aepanchi.github.io/scikit-learn-intelex/2024.3/

Changes proposed in this pull request:

• Introduce:
  • .github/workflows/publish.yml to enable automatic CI doc build
  • doc/index.html to redirect user to the latest doc version
  • doc/set_version.sh to set the doc version
  • doc/sources/_static/version_switcher.js and doc/sources/_templates/versions.html to switch versions
  • doc/versions.json to specify the doc versions to build
• Rename doc/sources/_static/style.css to doc/sources/_static/custom.css to align with conf.py; update the file with the version dropdown button configurations
• Update conf.py to include new configurations

Signed-off-by: Alexandra Epanchinzeva [email protected]

[ethanglaser]

Doc build CI fail: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'doc_version.json'

[ethanglaser]

The relative file paths seem to be adding some instability - is there an advantage to creating a json file over setting an environment variable or something like that? ie remove doc_version.json creation and instead get the environment variable here https://github.com/aepanchi/scikit-learn-intelex/blob/docs-ci/doc/sources/conf.py#L40

[aepanchi]

@ethanglaser @napetrov CI passes all checks except the doc one. The error is:

FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'sources/doc_version.json'
make: *** [Makefile:36: html] Error 2

But the script creates the file on the next line.

[ethanglaser]

publish.yml is not being triggered from anywhere - the failing step is from .ci/pipeline/docs.yml which does not include any of the necessary logic

[samir-nasibli]

@aepanchi who will continue to work on this PR? @ethanglaser @emmwalsh

[emmwalsh]

@aepanchi who will continue to work on this PR? @ethanglaser @emmwalsh

Hi @samir-nasibli I don't support scikit learn. Only oneDAL and daal4py

[samir-nasibli]

@aepanchi who will continue to work on this PR? @ethanglaser @emmwalsh

Hi @samir-nasibli I don't support scikit learn. Only oneDAL and daal4py

Thank you! I would like to clarify, is that mean that you are only support scikit-learn-intelex/daal4py documentation?

[emmwalsh]

@aepanchi who will continue to work on this PR? @ethanglaser @emmwalsh

Hi @samir-nasibli I don't support scikit learn. Only oneDAL and daal4py

Thank you! I would like to clarify, is that mean that you are only support scikit-learn-intelex/daal4py documentation?

so I will be approving PRs and customer-reported bugs at the moment

[emmwalsh]

Hi @samir-nasibli, I double-checked my support, and it says that I cover sci-kit-learn for PR reviews, so I think Ethan might be the best person to take over this PR. Then I can review it