fix: add docs + test for initial no-scan work
I'm going to get this merged as-is, but I'll set up an issue reminding us that we want a test and a preliminary docs entry (likely explaining what works and what doesn't, such as the fact that it won't operate without cve data yet)
Originally posted by @terriko in https://github.com/intel/cve-bin-tool/pull/5122#pullrequestreview-2911437168
Making this as a reminder for @joydeep049 We'd like
- a really basic test (i.e. something that shows that the --no-scan flag can be used from the CLI but doens't care much what it does)
- some initial information for the docs, likely explaining what works now and maybe a section about what's planned.
Should we wait and add a bit more features before updating the docs? I was hoping to get the language parser work done before changing the documentation, as discussed in the last meet. Or I could also add some docs now as well. Totally fine with me
I think we want really short "this option exists but it doesn't fully work yet" probably both in the help text and in the manual or readme. Mostly I don't want people who haven't been following development to get too excited when they see it in the pre-release.
Hi! @terriko I’d like to work on this issue as part of my GSoC 2026 preparation. I’ve set up the CVE Binary Tool locally and can reproduce the bug. May I please get this assigned to me?
Hi @terriko Just a reminder, I've already added PR for the docs work here