rdf:type are no longer stored in the user's graph

[cyberandy]

Please describe the issue here:

In the past, we stored all the rdf:type of an entity from DBpedia. See as an example the entity http://open.salzburgerland.com/en/entity/abtenau.html.

We no longer preserve this information, as we can see for the entity machine learning on the WordLift blog http://data.wordlift.io/wl0216/entity/machine_learning.html.

This information can be used to classify entities using the following query on the SPARQL end-point of the website:

SELECT * WHERE {
  SELECT ?type (COUNT(?type) AS ?count) WHERE {
    [] a ?type
    FILTER regex(?type, "^http://dbpedia.org/ontology")
  }
  GROUP BY ?type
}
ORDER BY DESC(?count)
LIMIT 20

Generally speaking it can be helpful for a user to edit this information - this was not possible previously.

[ziodave]

Generally speaking it can be helpful for a user to edit this information - this was not possible previously.

Yes I think it is required to allow the user to edit the types.

[cyberandy]

This information can be extremely valuable:

a) to improve the internal search experience of a website (i.e. user searches for "Dachstein Mountains" and the search engine suggests to see Abtenau), b) to recommend similar/related content

[stale[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.