get python unit test coverage to 100% (a pipe dream?!)

Open jcrowgey opened this issue 6 years ago • 4 comments

Feb 12 '19 05:02 jcrowgey

As soon as I get some time back, I'd like to contribute to this!

Feb 12 '19 09:02 yulqen

Hey @jcrowgey. How you getting on with the testing? I've been away for a while but still interested in how you're doing with this.

Jul 23 '19 08:07 yulqen

Hi, I've been super-busy finishing up a PhD that should have been completed a while ago. I'm mainly just trying to stay on top-of bug-reports at the moment---haven't worked on testing improvements at all. If you have some time to improve the testing, I'd love to see it.

Cheers!

Jul 24 '19 18:07 jcrowgey

IMO 100% coverage is a non-goal, but incremental coverage goals are good, especially when they can be encoded into the tooling (so it can nudge people "hey, our goal is n% coverage for this file, consider adding test coverage along with your change").

Aug 24 '24 17:08 dbarnett