nsfwjs
nsfwjs copied to clipboard
False positive-parrot images
When using Mobilenet V2 4.2mb Model, the following images show false positives Parrot courtship dance - Identified as Porn - 61.18% Parrot sleeping - Identified as Porn - 59.64% Parrot eating - Identified as Porn - 68.27% Parrot moving at high speed - Identified as Porn - 95.78% Banana - Identified as Porn - 95.21% Lovebird - Identified as Porn - 61.15% Parrot's claws - Identified as Porn - 69.66%
Seems to have a strange false positives rate for parrots?
A few additions: Parrot calling - Identified as Porn - 70.59% Overlooking a parrot - Identified as Porn - 91.37% Parrot - Identified as Porn - 69.18% Parrot shakes its head - Identified as Porn - 51.20% More Parrot - Identified as Porn - 70.51%
That is strange! How does the 90MB model perform?
That is strange! How does the 90MB model perform?
The situation doesn't look promising either I'll get more pictures to test it out
What a crazy result! We'll have to add parrot pictures to the training data next round.