Andreas Klöckner

Results 924 comments of Andreas Klöckner

Reproducible with 9cf3654 (using Debian's llvm/clang 1:18.1.8-13).

Thanks for investigating, and sorry about the red herring here!

Thanks for the detailed analysis! The real solution to this will be to stop relying on a hacked-up Boost that's a pain to upgrade, see #393 for work towards that...

Thanks! A release with this is forthcoming.

I would be happy to consider a PR along those lines.

Thanks for doing this. All this is definitely intended to "just work", at least eventually.

What made you decide to close this? I figure we'll want something like this in the medium term?

Potentially, we could `fork` before each test? This avoids paying for the interpreter startup cost repeatedly. I don't know that there is a reliable way to reset a monkeypatched module...

`fork` would also offer a way to parallelize runs.

I also just encountered this issue, on a self-hosted instance. https://github.com/huginn/huginn is a good example of a webhook receive that will, by default, return a code of 201.