Valentin Rothberg

Shipping a unit directly with Podman sounds good to me, too 👍

> As it is, users stumble across this again and again. I can't speak for the general industry but here, no one wants to hear about podman again for instance....

@Luap99 @ygalblum can you confirm the proposed solution of shipping a systemd unit and adding that as a dependency for rootless Quadlets? I'd like to get this fixed soon to...

Not needed after https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/22638 anymore

I am very late to the game but think that `podman history` is the way to go. `skopeo` could expose the command as well but it would be strictly limited...

Thanks for reaching out, @fgiloux! The request sounds reasonable to me. @mtrmac WDYT?

Thanks for reaching out. What is the exact error you are getting? Which version of Skopeo are you using?

Thanks! Yes, `skopeo sync` refuses to overwrite existing directories on the host to prevent accidental data corruption. I think we can make the behavior conditional by adding a new flag...

> anyway this is also the case when the destination is a docker registry. No. This only happens for the `dir:` transport.

> It feels like we're reimplementing rsync sweat_smile :rofl: I think we should keep it simple. The destination will be removed and recreated (i.e., full overwrite)?