Utkarsh Gupta

Oh, sweet. This is great. Thanks, @g1257 (and @picca for driving this!).

Hi, is there any ETA on this?

Hi @marcandre 👋🏻 I know this is a bit untraditional (& you might be aware of this already) but there's this cop `Packaging/RequireRelativeHardcodingLib` which wants people to use `require` over...

FWIW, there's already a [Packaging/RequireHardcodingLib](https://github.com/utkarsh2102/rubocop-packaging/blob/master/lib/rubocop/cop/packaging/require_hardcoding_lib.rb) cop which "almost" checks the same thing and autocorrects the offenses. Why I say almost is because it only checks for those calls which are...

Hi @coding-bunny, > I'd like to see an example as well, as I have a hard time understanding what is being implied. > Especially for "running tests against code that's...

Hi @coding-bunny, > When you use `require "foo/bar.rb"` (explicitly with the .rb) then for me you are doing something wrong. You're requiring files explicitly to something that should be existing...

Hi, I am a Debian packager and I can take this forward only if we have a stable release along with the proper tests, ready. Otherwise, the package won't build...

Oh it also fails on Ubuntu ppc64el. Here are the logs: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/682040467/buildlog_ubuntu-mantic-ppc64el.opentsne_0.6.2-1_BUILDING.txt.gz

Hi @anthonyfok, Could you take a look at this?

/cc @xijo, could you please take a look at it and consider this? :)