Rodrigo

@huantaoliu I generally like that idea, we could add a flag to skip initialization, feel free to create a PR with a proposal and I'll review it

@ttshivers I like this idea! Is there any action item/follow up that us, the library Authors can do? Updating documentation? Improving the module API? Feel free to propose and i'd...

> I think this could be accomplished with an internal change where the publish method uses a separate connection that we would also need to set up. Do you have...

> > > I think this could be accomplished with an internal change where the publish method uses a separate connection that we would also need to set up. >...

A while ago i had the idea of "connection pooling" because it felt that some connections were being recreated and could potentially be re-used but if you do have an...

@gastonelhordoy I believe this could be tweaked and possibly allow developers to inject that and our module infer through DI. Do you think you could potentially push this feature? I...

@WonderPanda It will require your manual merge permissions as CI is expecting Node 16 to run but it is never going to 😅

@WonderPanda Bumping on this 😅 GH is expecting to run GH 16 even thought it was removed 🤣

@kchow1985 Hi, sorry for getting back at this so late. This seems to a bug of some sort, might require an investigation but if you're willing to help and contribute...

I'm currently running into the same issue as @jasongerbes , so far I've built a tiny helper using `swc-loader`, `swc only` and compared it with `babel` (the outputs are different...