Paul Tsnobiladzé

My goal would be to have the same name mangling rule to remember for Bucklescript, Reason and JSX instead of at least 3 rules right now. Something like: if you...

Thank you Jordan for considering this issue seriously, I think in the long term these apparent "small fixes" can really smooth out the developer experience. Of course I realize it...

this would simplify so many bindings! A lot of bindings have been significantly improved thanks to latest changes in runtime representations (records, variants, etc), this is one of the last...

Ok thanks, there's no hurry anyway, I'll update my PR accordingly.

Good idea! that would indeed be quite elegant. I always forget you don't need an additional unit argument in such cases. That would help reduce the amount of functions needed...

Well there seems to be no real consensus on this: https://forum.rescript-lang.org/t/api-convention-for-reverse-versions-of-belt-functions/457/ Among 22 respondents, the bigger part would prefer to have extra functions, a smaller part would like to have...

sure, would like me to revert the commit where I add the `reverse` versions and rebase to trunk?

ok I created a separate PR (#4748) to make things easier and cleaner.

> Could be revisited now if rebased on master, assuming there's still interest. Yeah I think those functions can still be interesting from time to time. I'll rebase it on...

might be interesting to follow what is being done by https://github.com/reason-in-barcelona/react-rules-of-hooks-ppx