Martin Yeo

Part of a larger conversation: - #4710 - #4798

You'll be interested to hear that it is coverage that makes testing the latest Python version twice as slow as the other Python versions. Can't tell if it is the...

Can we copy the format used in iris-grib? ``` - name: "upload coverage report" if: ${{ matrix.coverage }} uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4 with: token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }} ```

Probably best to look at this AFTER the changes in #5084!

Heads up @stephenworsley. Even if we're deprecating the API in question, I know we're using ESMPy a lot going forwards so this might be behaviour to watch for.

>At the same time, we should move it all out of 'experimental' Scope creep!

> The benchmark report is a bit puzzling. I will look into it. Is there already a benchmark for `concatenate`? https://github.com/SciTools/iris/blob/d9c4c1d4f6fabe6bd8f6a6d56c95fe051f3b3663/benchmarks/benchmarks/merge_concat.py#L42-L61

You might already be aware, but here is the final remaining action: https://github.com/SciTools/iris/pull/5926#discussion_r1736355382

>Are there any plans for `iris.experimental.stratify.relevel`? Or are you planning to remove it in favour of more advanced techniques such as 3D regridding? [Planning to remove it because no-one is...

From discussion in @SciTools/peloton: we can definitely see the merit in an Iris-to-stratify convenience, but it shouldn't look the way it does now (written to solve a very specific case)!...