Tirumarai Selvan

This was actually a mistake in the documentation and is being fixed here: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/pull/5105 Normal queries and actions, both are run sequentially.

Yes, I think we should be able to do that in the future. Will change this issue into a feature request.

The RHS of any operator, in this case `_contains`, can either by an `X-hasura-*` variable or a valid literal. We have noted this feature request though. Thanks !

@m4rcelofs RHS is the value that you provide for the operator, in your case: `{"user": "x-hasura-user-id"}`. This is neither a `x-hasura-*` variable nor a pure json literal. EDIT: To be...

@lucasmachadorj Can you check what `type` of JWT is being generated by Cognito? Is it `type: RS256` ? Or something else?

Also, you do not need `type` key in JWT config if `jwk_url` is being used since [v1.2](https://hasura.io/docs/1.0/graphql/manual/auth/authentication/jwt.html#configuring-jwt-mode). So, this issue needs more info. For e.g you can use jwt.io to...

Hey @mitar You can accomplish this relationship via computed fields esp https://docs.hasura.io/1.0/graphql/manual/schema/computed-fields.html#table-computed-fields I created a function like: ``` CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.fetch_user_jsons(user_row usertable) RETURNS SETOF jsontable LANGUAGE sql STABLE...

@dminkovsky Yes. Since there is no simple way to define "foreign key"-like relationships with JSONB keys in Postgres, computed fields which return SETOF is the best pattern to use here.

HI @sergeimonakhov What kind of workloads are you running in Hasura in the timeframe provided in your screenshot?

> @tirumaraiselvan The only thing we added compared to the previous version is remote schema permissions. I have just noticed, that Hasura stores them all as a huge string in...