proposal-change-array-by-copy
proposal-change-array-by-copy copied to clipboard
tc39
Provides additional methods on Array.prototype and TypedArray.prototype to enable changes on the array by returning a new copy of it with the change.
CompareTypedArrayElements still contains the detached buffer check which has been removed in .
Sorry it's too late to add this issue, I commented that on the yesterday meeting. Though I didn't want to block this proposal in the meeting, I think we still...
## Description I'm sorry if understood the proposal wrong or didn't research it well enough but why it's better to have `toReversed()`, `toSorted()` along with `reverse()`, `sort()`? (I can agree...
Issue to track Stage 3 reviewers feedback Spec: https://tc39.es/proposal-change-array-by-copy/ Reviewers: - [x] @ljharb - [x] @jridgewell - [x] @chicoxyzzy - [x] @nicolo-ribaudo Editors: - [ ] @bakkot - [ ]...
An issue to collect discussions/results around researching existing code to extract data that may help with the design/scope of this proposal. # Array Method Usage Using the [GitHub dataset on...
Ensuring that no clashes exists between the web reality and this proposal is an essential precondition to Stage 3. This will require research work with implementers.
I can (with great regret) live with the fact that `toSorted()` eliminates empty slots (although I think symmetry with functionally similar APIs is much more charitable than symmetry by the...
What is the reason by the name `toSpliced()` and not something like `removeValues()` or `replaceValues()`? And why `with()` and not something like `replaceValue()`?
