tanvigour
tanvigour
Hi @MattCosturos , here's the certification test https://github.com/dapr/components-contrib/blob/master/tests/certification/bindings/azure/eventhubs/eventhubs_test.go#L330 which covers a case with 2 dapr bindings where each binding is fixed to a partition id and that seems to go...
I agree we should be backing each added feature to stable components with appropriate certification /conformance tests. For versioning, the scope and impact of the added feature should decide whether...
## Test Plan Draft ### Proposed tests (Certification) - Test sending /receiving data between single partition - Start an app with 1 sender and 1 receiver - Provide multiple partitions...
Are you talking in terms of DNS for dapr while specifying in CSP headers?
Thanks for the plan Amulya, overall this looks good. Here are few suggested changes from my side 1. Verifying for optional parameters may not be needed as a part of...
This would make certification test stage approval more stricter so that we can directly move beta to stable instead of waiting one release to move to stable, is that correct?
@cvictory Thanks for proposing this design. I am not very sure if we really need database API. Could you elaborate little more around the use case?