Steven Schlansker

Thanks for the update. We'll hold off on dropping any support and look forward to updating to 1.0 once it is reached.

One thing we do in our stack, we actually assert that Java's timezone == Postgres's timezone, in which case it all works just right. Should we maybe emit a warning...

I'll reopen this for now, there is good discussion to be had here, and @findepi we do care a lot about doing things correctly! We are also just pragmatic and...

That'd be the idea, although these aren't really 'experimental' as such.

That's cool! My main concern is that changing to this approach could manifest as a regression for users using esoteric drivers. But maybe with appropriate messaging on the release notes...

Let's keep it to a minor version, we just released 3, and this is only a breaking change if you hold it wrong... ;)

I think that's an interesting idea! Definitely would give a prototype a spin.

I'm not sure I understand -- why is being a drop-in replacement for `spring-jdbc` a goal? If you're writing against `spring-jdbc`'s interface already, then it seems like you have almost...

We would love to be able to test these sorts of behavior as well. We don't want to have to mock static classes - this gets ugly fast. It'd be...

I believe that the latest `2.12.0-SNAPSHOT` builds should cover the basic needs for this feature. Instead of attempting to add specific Immutables support, I simply enhanced Enunciate's Jackson support enough...