Stefan Karlsson

Results 16 comments of Stefan Karlsson

> is the new version acceptable? I would have preferred if the parsing code were not placed in a .hpp file, and would have placed it in a .inline.hpp file,...

> > > > is the new version acceptable? > > > > > > > > > I would have preferred if the parsing code were not placed in...

> Graal still doesn't support generational ZGC though I'm actively working on it. I'm hoping to have it in before rampdown but at least until that time JVMCI needs to...

This is my proposal: For this JEP, I propose that we stick with the current plan that -XX:+UseZGC always mean Generational ZGC. If the user try to enable the Graal...

> GC folk should be reviewing this not runtime. I don't fully agree with that. How these serviceability tools work, and their interfaces, are usually not something that we GC...

This is not related to GC code, could you remove the hotspot-gc label you added?

I started to review the patch and was wondering if this could be simplify to something like this?: https://github.com/stefank/jdk/commit/f38c791793440b899ce6c4c9723470a5d4b18050 I tested this with this small section of temporary static_asserts: https://github.com/stefank/jdk/commit/30da4d6abeee14e4e4f44034295f1bb0ad2e3016...

> > I started to review the patch and was wondering if this could be simplify to something like this?: [stefank@f38c791](https://github.com/stefank/jdk/commit/f38c791793440b899ce6c4c9723470a5d4b18050) > > Sure, it could be done. This is...