Stas Levin

That would be a great feature to have!

Cool, it would be interesting to see if this can be sorted out. How about this? (let's put the recursion-can-cause-a-stackoverflow issue aside) ``` scala def read(recordReader: RecordReader[Record], records: LinkedList[Record], lastId:...

@JGailor thanks for the additional info and context. I was wondering if you had any reasons to not just remove any references to the old batch and let GC do...

@hellomaya, I might be missing something here, but won't this give you what you want? ``` scala def groupBy[TPost, TCategory](postWithCategoryTuples: Seq[(TPost, TCategory)]): Map[TCategory, Seq[TPost]] = { postWithCategoryTuples .groupBy({ case (post,...

Hi guys, thanks for the input, appreciate it. I did not mean these features should be removed from the language. What I meant was that being somewhat more advanced concepts...

@alexandru You are right, my bad. I keep being lured into this by the speller's auto-correct suggestions without noticing I'm trading one typo for another :)

+1, validation feedback icons would make a great addition.

I think it would be cool to have a language construct, enter `YOU'VE JUST BEEN ERASED,`, that allows one to comment out _statement blocks_ in a semantic manner. Basically done...

Implemented in pending pull request [`#40`](https://github.com/lhartikk/ArnoldC/pull/40).

Pull request [`#40`](https://github.com/lhartikk/ArnoldC/pull/40). Personally I thought [`RIGHT? WRONG!`](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8-HDUBbtgQ) was kinda fitting as well, but I guess either would work.