Maxime Labelle

The [`group_by()`](https://github.com/jmespath-community/jmespath.spec/discussions/96#discussion-4282156) function is currently being proposed for inclusion in the next version of JMESPath Community.

@tomelliff JSON literals are there to output valid JSON and [whitespace is allowed but ignored](https://github.com/jmespath-community/jmespath.spec/pull/130) when emitting the resulting JSON. That is why they are stripped. Your expression uses deprecated...

@mrry we at [JMESPath Community](https://jmespath.site/main) are currently working on improving the standard and extending the feature set from JMESPath. We have a [set of useful improvements](https://github.com/jmespath-community/jmespath.spec/discussions/97) as our next milestone...

The upcoming [`let()` function](https://github.com/jmespath-community/jmespath.spec/discussions/24#discussioncomment-3285710) in JMESPath Community is specifically designed to achieve this scenario.

@ric79 unfortunately what you want to achieve is not possible using JMESPath. You have to know the input structure to query specific portions of the input. As currently specified, I’m...

@chipsenkbeil We want to [propose this feature to JMESPath](https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.jep/issues/31) and will include this in the [next iteration for JMESPath Community](https://github.com/jmespath-community/jmespath.spec/discussions/151).

@ric79 We want to [propose this feature to JMESPath](https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.jep/issues/31) and will include this in the [next iteration for JMESPath Community](https://github.com/jmespath-community/jmespath.spec/discussions/151).

Oh maybe I misconstrued your example. Unfortunately no, that's not something that would be easily done in the general case I'm afraid. Seems similar to [this request]( https://github.com/jmespath/jmespath.site/issues/96) if I'm...

@zalmane @ntextreme3 you might be interested to learn that [JMESPath Community](https://github.com/jmespath-community/jmespath.spec/wiki/discarding-nulls) supports this scenario - albeit currently in an indirect way.

> That's completely different that what the OP asked... > The questions was how search can support None values as well, currently they are discarded. Hum 🤔 then maybe I’m...