Sonny Piers

> GNOME adopting Flatpak > GNOME Nightly announcement Thanks for taking over! About GNOME the reason I didn't put it in the list is that Flatpak and GNOME are so...

I wanted your opinion to know if you would accept such patch. So, answer is yes? :)

cc @benjamingr any thought?

> Operational errors and programmer errors have nothing to do with async/sync (I can find a reference where I debate this with the person who wrote the Joyent error handling...

is there a consensus on whether promise instantiation may/should throw? for example ``` javascript delay('123') // throws ``` like in my "throw" approach example above or maybe a interesting discussion...

I've updated the "throw for callback, reject for promise" approach with a much more convenient approach

thanks for the links, agree with you > Operational errors and programmer errors have nothing to do with async/sync True, updated the "throw" approach > Promise creation shouldn't throw, it...

here is a proposal https://github.com/sonnyp/polygoat/pull/10

> If you want to "dezalgo" I'd do it by Promise.resolve.then(...) which already does dezalgo through a correct scheduler - but note that callback users wouldn't expect "dezalgo"ing to happen...

setTimeout/postMessage is an other option Yes, it's not as fast but in the browser who cares?