Simon Hengel

>> Perhaps accepting `NonEmpty a` would be best(?) > It would definitely be an improvement. I don't see this as a clear-cut improvement. `elements` is frequently used with static lists....

@chris-martin Hey, thanks for taking the time to open this issue and sorry for the late reply! How would you want to specify that a specific example should be ignored...

That would be fine with me. However, it may be that the nested comment is already stripped by GHC (it may even be a bug, not sure). In that case...

One more question, does it work in `>`-style comments too?

@andreasabel I think we want to make sure that `--ghc-options=-Wno-type-defaults` works as expected, or at the very least understand what exactly is happening here. Can you check if `--ghc-options=-Wno-type-defaults` takes...

This sounds frightening. If you can come up with a repro then I guess we need a Cabal issue for this (a repro without `-w doctest` would be ideal, but...

> `doctest` however gets confused in such settings. E.g. I installed `doctest` for 9.2.5: > > ``` > $ cabal install -w ghc-9.2.5 doctest --program-suffix=-9.2.5 > ... > $ doctest-9.2.5...

@andreasabel please try if `--with-hc-pkg=ghc-pkg-9.2.5` can be used as a workaround.

@andreasabel https://github.com/haskell/cabal/pull/8718 addresses this in `Cabal`; no changes to `doctest` required.

> I think it would be better to set up Travis CI to automate Hackage uploads (and binaries #256). That's something I'm pretty familiar with, so I can try to...