Steffen Jaeckel

> The conversion exists and works, but [...] I'd never recommend working with a converted project [...] > I may just as well contribute the resulting premake4.lua file OK, IMO...

> > Theoretically the code does impose XP as minimum already in `s_mp_rand_platform.c`, but NT 4.0 in `rng_get_bytes.c` > > Please feel free to bring both to the same state!...

> i wonder why there's not been any comment by @sjaeckel or @karel-m since this seems to be a serious issue. because I'm not certain yet on how to solve...

@karel-m 2 fine for you as well?

Does anyone think it's worth to keep the old approach alive? (probably as `LTC_BURN_STACK`)

Sorry for the delay, but I was busy in the last weeks. > if the initial analysis posted by OP is correct, the old approach uses undefined behaviour. i don't...

> ``` > aesni_desc (new AES-NI) > aessw_desc (old SW implementation aes_desc renamed to aessw_desc) > aes_desc (aes with runtime autodetection of aessw/aesni variant) > ``` > > With this...

Hah, having a second look I understand your reasoning ... I have to think about it a bit more!

Isn't that kind of a 'feature' to have a good replacement in case your regular `test` is defect? ;) \

Jokes aside, we have the following set of demos etc. ``` aesgcm 2* constants 1* hashsum 2* ltcrypt 2* openssl-enc 2* sizes 1* small 0* test 0* timing 0* tv_gen...