sinclairzx81

@hlovdal > Could you update to specific commit references instead? Updated

@samchon Hi, Just going to chime in on this one. While I certainly think this project could benefit from additional benchmarks and tests, I do not think that these should...

@moltar Hi! > How about instead of categories, we use a concept of tags. That way anyone can select any arbitrary assortment of tags to compare. And Deepkit can have...

@yovanoc Hi, thanks for your interest in the library. Unfortunately, the lib is pending a rebuild and isn't in a publishable state. I plan to revisit sometime later next year...

@yovanoc Hi, Um, I may return to this project one day. Unfortunately, I had made some attempts to get this project working with Node, Deno, Bun and the Web Browser...

@yovanoc Heya, > I think if we can await import in the callback it should cover all cases There might be some caveats to that, not sure. The way this...

@quentinverlhac Hi, Thanks for the suggestion, I think this is a good idea. Currently intrinsic string manipulation types are only supported for remapping finite literal/template literal values, with the intrinsic...

@gregsdennis Hi! > Any plans on supporting later versions, especially draft 2020-12? I'd like to have TypeBox producing schematics inline with the 2020-12 specification, however the library is currently keeping...

@gregsdennis @jdesrosiers Hi, thanks for the responses and reference to https://github.com/hyperjump-io/json-schema, I may be interested in including this library in the TB test suite. It looks good. > Ajv hasn't...

@jdesrosiers Hey, thanks for the follow up! > But, just in case, I'll warn that targeting the lowest specifications can be problematic. JSON Schema is not backwards compatible, so if...