Scala Buggabot

@paulp said: Duplicate of #2296.

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-3600?orig=1 Reporter: Alex Hvostov (argv)

Gabriel Rossetti (grossetti) said: Yes, this would be nice

@paulp said: A meta-annotation should be used to disambiguate between package and package object.

Nathan Stoddard (nstoddard) said: This would be very nice to have for the @strictfp annotation, especially for package objects.

@gzm0 said: After discussion with Lukas Rytz, we are of the opinion that allowing annotations on package objects and requiring a java source file if (Java-)annotations on packages are required...

@xeno-by said: I would like to mention that loading Java-based package annotations via Scala reflection isn't implemented yet.

@gzm0 said: Thanks for the info. This won't affect what we propose.

Imported From: https://issues.scala-lang.org/browse/SI-10136?orig=1 Reporter: @paulp Affected Versions: 2.12.0, 2.12.1

@dwijnand said: Regressed in https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/5294/commits/df3689139c4d4bcd2933364d13b8195c3433eb43#diff-b0ef0bb8bad267f2f13f569b598215fd (one of the "fields" phase PRs)