mdBook
                                
                                 mdBook copied to clipboard
                                
                                    mdBook copied to clipboard
                            
                            
                            
                        Please allow table of contents entries that don't have markdown pages.
eg:
# Summary
- [Toolchain Setup](toolchain_setup.md)
- [Project Setup](project_setup.md)
- [Volatile](volatile.md)
- [Bit Packing](bit_packing.md)
- Video
  - [Display Control](display_control.md)
This would allow for better TOC organization without having to have useless blank pages.
@Lokathor
I believe you can obtain what you want with a Part Title (it took me a while to understand that the # was not parsed as markdown:
- [Bit Packing](bit_packing.md)
# Video
  - [Display Control](display_control.md)
Very neat, I didn't know a person could do that.
However, it seems that style makes the numbering not include the part entries.
However, it seems that style makes the numbering not include the part entries.
Yes. I think that the only way to have subnumbering is to use a blank page as you mention.
To help people stumbling on this thread:
Approach 1 (requires blank page)
- [Bit Packing](bit_packing.md)
- [Video](blank.md)
  - [Display Control](display_control.md)
  - [Foo](foo.md)
Generates:
1. Bit Packing
2. Video
   2.1 Display Control
   2.2 Foo
Approach 2 (no blank page)
- [Bit Packing](bit_packing.md)
# Video
  - [Display Control](display_control.md)
  - [Foo](foo.md)
Generates:
1. Bit Packing
Video
2. Display Control
3. Foo
It's a hack, but seems like you could use draft pages to achieve this?
- [Video]()
  - [Display Control](display_control.md)
  - [Foo](foo.md)
Then Video will be greyed out, but not require a blank page.
This was discussed in #1820 as well (the PR closed just above). See https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/pull/1820#issuecomment-1255663374 for a rationale against using draft chapters for this. Special syntax (just an entry without a link?) would thus be warranted, and IMO make more sense.