Alexey Kutepov

@omissis thanks for this PR! I'm a bit busy right now. I'll take a look into it in the forthcoming days.

@edermanoel94 yeah, sure! Go ahead! :)

@mfocko I don't really like it: 1. This design adds complexity to the syntax of the TODOs and I'm not sure if the value we get out of it is...

@mfocko so you suggest to introduce already 2 entities to solve a problem of just assigning a label: keyword and switch. Too complicated, don't like even more.

@Ciremun thank you for filing this! I could not reproduce that on Linux, but I'll check it out on Windows when I get a chance!

@yordis I would actually really appreciate if you elaborated on what exactly you want from the Intellij integration. We have a similar issue but for Emacs #76. You can use...

@yordis a task for each of the subcommands sounds good. Thanks! Auto syncing sounds kinda dangerous, because snitch may do something unexpected. That's why `report` and `purge` are interactive, to...

Just for the record. The main reason why subcommands are interactive is false positive match of a very general regular expression that is very hard to fix #2.

@fabulousduck when the PR is merged all of the TODOs it contained automatically approved. Basically, I review not only the code, but also the future issues it may introduce. And...

@fabulousduck it sounds ok to me