cattrs
                                
                                 cattrs copied to clipboard
                                
                                    cattrs copied to clipboard
                            
                            
                            
                        Types of nested generic fields are not specific enough
- cattrs version: 1.8.0
- Python version: 3.9.7
- Operating System: macOS
Description
Let's have the following test case
    @define
    class X(Generic[T]):
        field: List[T]
    def pred(cls):
        print(f">>> {cls}")
        return False
    result = X[int]([1, 2, 3])
    data = asdict(result)
    c = GenConverter()
    c.register_unstructure_hook_factory(pred, lambda cls: lambda obj: None)
    c.unstructure(result, X[int])
    assert c.structure(data, X[int]) == result
it passes, yet it prints
>>> tests.test_generics.test_karel.<locals>.X[int]
>>> typing.List[~T]
>>> ~T
Should it not be the case that the nested fields types (such as List[~T]) are provided with the type resolved, similarly to how the X[int] is provided in its most specific form?
It will be the case when I merge https://github.com/python-attrs/cattrs/pull/177 in a few days :)
Can this be closed now?