PublicLab.Editor
PublicLab.Editor copied to clipboard
corrected identation of modules
The problem arose post https://github.com/publiclab/PublicLab.Editor/pull/636 Make sure these boxes are checked before your pull request (PR) is ready to be reviewed and merged. Thanks!
- [ ] tests pass -- look for a green checkbox ✔️ a few minutes after opening your PR -- or run tests locally with
grunt jasmine - [ ] code is in uniquely-named feature branch and has no merge conflicts
- [ ] PR is descriptively titled
- [ ] PR body includes
fixes #0000-style reference to original issue # - [ ] ask
@publiclab/reviewersfor help, in a comment below
We're happy to help you get this ready -- don't be afraid to ask for help, and don't be discouraged if your tests fail at first!
If tests do fail, click on the red X to learn why by reading the logs.
Please be sure you've reviewed our contribution guidelines at https://publiclab.org/contributing-to-public-lab-software
We have a loose schedule of reviewing and pulling in changes every Tuesday and Friday, and publishing changes on Fridays.
Thanks!

The problem was with module 1 and module 5
This looks great. I also noticed the toolbar in the rich text module is not consistent...
could it be somewhere around here?
https://github.com/publiclab/PublicLab.Editor/blob/cf1fc4a9c4b70afaede856bac214e27388ab6cfa/src/adapters/PublicLab.Woofmark.js#L372

we don't have to solve this here. but just thinking it might be easy to add.
could it be somewhere around here?
https://github.com/publiclab/PublicLab.Editor/blob/cf1fc4a9c4b70afaede856bac214e27388ab6cfa/src/adapters/PublicLab.Woofmark.js#L372
we don't have to solve this here. but just thinking it might be easy to add.
@jywarren yes, I noticed that. I thought it would be better if we make a separate PR..
@jywarren Yes