Peter

I'm working on a PR that also includes the change @paralin mentioned and a few more things e.g. to also run all tests with Podman. There's another PR that already...

I'll try to also add some docs till then - end of August sounds reasonable to write at least some hints/examples

I'll resolve the conflicts in the evening. I wasn't sure how to 'fix' the coverage issue as I don't have much experience with codecov and it would be necessary to...

Don't know how to fix the patch coverage issue but at least to overall coverage is fixed 🙂 Let me know if there's something missing otherwise I'd squash the commits...

I'll have a look at your nits probably tomorrow, thanks for your feedback! Sorry about "mixing" up the PR, I tried to separate the changes in multiple commits to improve...

Thanks @kiview for the feedback. I honestly forgot to update the PR description but you're right, this is only about re-mapping bind mounts if the current process is running in...

:smile: yeah I mean there are always things that can be improved and some corner cases that are hard to circumvent e.g. if a user has a...socket-to-TCP proxy to -...

What's the current state of this? Is it missing something?

Hey, not sure if this still 'a thing' but could you probably elaborate how you imagine the workflow or what could be the benefit? - being able to run tests...

I'll have a look for the corresponding `t.Skip()` in the tests and remove it in the upcoming week