Peter Linss

@mmetc thanks for taking a look at this so quickly. But looking at the PR I'm not sure the implementation is correct. You are parsing all the CRL blocks, but...

@mmetc I appreciate the effort, fwiw I'm happy to review a PR and/or test locally

Interesting idea, and wouldn't be hard to add. I'm curious though, why you wouldn't simply add the allowed codes to flake8's ignore list? That way you'd never have to add...

@ivanlonel what you're describing sounds like a different issue, there have ben recent improvements in recognizing violations in multi-line tokens (like docstrings). Are you using the latest version?

It's possible. flake8-noqa needs to run last and get notified of all the other violations that happen. Since flake8 doesn't provide an API to do either, flake8-noqa needs to monkeypatch...

So `normalized_method_names` has two behaviors. If you pass in a method definition (including arguments) it only looks at that and computes the possible variations based on the passed arguments. If...

Thanks for the PR, can you also update the `test-expected.txt` file? (See CONTRIBUTING.md)

The TAG reviewed this proposal and has largely the same concerns. Our feedback: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/548#issuecomment-697793427