Radim Řehůřek

@damonmerrill that would be great – we welcome contributions on all levels: https://github.com/sponsors/piskvorky

@ERijck can you please fix the merge conflict & update the LGPL link as per @pabs3 's comment above? Thanks.

I've been running & testing #3148 (@sylt's PR), so far without problems. It seems more complete – perhaps the two PRs could be combined, gaining the benefit of both? And...

I don't think these methods are a part of the Python dict API, are they? Sqlitedict's goal is to be a "dict with commit". So its gracefulness should mimic that...

OK, that `dict_reverseitemiterator` is interesting. Maybe there is some "under the hood" API for reverse iteration in dict, after all. If that's the case we could support it too. But...

@mpenkov do you know how that works? Any way to supply our own `dict_reverseitemiterator`? @jiangwen365 can you look into it & open a PR? We probably won't have time for...

Is smart_open core the right place for such buffering? IMO that should either go directly in Python (as your CPython ticket suggests), or live in user-land as a custom registered...

@sunank200 I don't think there's anything to fix - it's just not supported yet.

Sorry, I don't think this repo has been updated in 3 years. It shouldn't be too difficult to update the accuracy method here to work with the newer gensim models...

I don't think the core logic changed at all. It's probably just some attributes/classes/module changing place.