Peter Evans

Apologies, I realise now that I confused the property type and resource type the property is associated with. I've hidden my comment because it's unrelated to the issue at hand.

Ah, good to know! 😆

It looks to me like the problem is using `committer_date` instead of `workflows.created_at` in the latest merge commit to `main`. See https://github.com/eddiewebb/circleci-queue/commit/e74ca30d0bc5a82b4d8fea49092f2551e62f698e. There are no tags, so it's not clear,...

Made a PR for the above mentioned change: https://github.com/eddiewebb/circleci-queue/pull/108

Hi @jcbhmr Interesting feature idea. I wouldn't be opposed to adding this because it doesn't break behaviour for existing users. The feature would only be active if the `title` input...

Hi @jagthedrummer Fine-grained PATs may work for some use cases, but not all. They are still in beta and some GitHub APIs don't support them yet. For example, https://github.com/peter-evans/create-pull-request/issues/1791 This...

Hi @kwavnet I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to extract that information. I'm using [Octokit](https://github.com/octokit/octokit.js) to handle API requests, so it depends if I can tap...

Hi @jackkoenig I'm happy add information about using fine-grained PATs to this section of the documentation, but it should be a separate bullet point and not replace the existing advice....

Hi @arijit-sen Please show me your workflow so I can help you.

Hi @oscarbenjamin > Maybe it is just not possible to get this setup working with a fine grained PAT. That would not surprise me. Fine-grained access tokens are still in...