Petee

Question 1: Is my understanding correct that the `node`s `optional` (duplicating `group` with `?`) and `repetition` (duplicating `group` with `*`) are no longer used and can be removed?

> My biggest concern really is supporting the parser options, particularly lookahead. How are you dealing with that? I guess I'll know once I progress far enough to try to...

A small update for this weekend's progress (can't really give it much time during working days): * successfully implemented `disjunction`, `lookaheadGroup` and `group` with `!` (non-empty match) - only missing...

Hey, another update after a long time, I was sick in some previous weeks so my work on this slowed down quite a lot. First of all, I just noticed...

@klondikedragon Thanks for the comment! My work priorities have quite shifted since the last time I wrote here and I didn't have any capacity to continue this. It's still very...

Also, please coordinate with me before contributing on top of my mess - I definitely would first like to rebase it, split it to more reasonable commits and discuss certain...

@klondikedragon thanks for trying the old branch! Rebasing to master is going to take some effort as there really were quite a few changes, plus I'd like to rework some...

@klondikedragon those are some really interesting results, thank you very much for sharing them. :) Could you also do a comparison benchmark for just the parsing step on some quite...

@alecthomas ping about this. The generated parser will differ from the reflective parser's behavior here and I would like to make sure that the reported behavior is indeed incorrect -...

I'm not 100% sure we mean the same thing, but it sounds like I have a use case for something like that when writing a parser for Jinja (specifically, implicit...