Pete Batard

Sorry, as much as I'd like to satisfy all requests ASAP, there's only so much time I can spare for development, so I have to prioritize, and unfortunately, command line...

I'm absolutely fine with getopts, which does its job splendidly as far as I'm concerned (and with a __low footprint__, which is precisely what I want). So the parsing of...

> Can you make a TODO list of the required low-level changes in the repo, though? I'm afraid not. Even as this is an Open Source project, there's a good...

> how long do you think it'll be until you make it where someone can configure all the settings and can deploy ISO images via the command line without needing...

Thanks, but please note that I'm going to defer all translation updates until I start a new translation round (which will probably be a couple months from now). I will...

That's a good suggestion. I'll see if I can implement that, but I'm afraid this will be low priority, and it may have to wait until the next UI redesign...

Yes, there was a Pull Request going in that direction, but it's not that simple and I had to reject it, for the reasons [explained here](https://github.com/pbatard/rufus/pull/1689#issuecomment-773240275)...

The current handling of `efi.img` is a workaround for Debian Live, so it only applies to these specific ISOs (which only need the UEFI bootloader extracted to work). I strongly...

Note that Rufus 3.6 will introduce full extraction of `efi.img` files. This means that distros like Solus will boot properly, even if the UFD has been created in ISO mode.

@ryanturcotte, you might be interested with [this entry from the FAQ](https://github.com/pbatard/rufus/wiki/FAQ#Im_trying_to_work_with_an_ISO_but_Rufus_says_its_unsupported). Looking at the content of the Lenovo ISOs, what you need to do is create a DOS drive (which...