Paul Smith

It's a little confusing, and might point to a redesign of their syntax and associated API functions.

Having a [Responder](https://github.com/adhocteam/pushup/blob/main/_runtime/pushup_support.go#L18) be usable as a `http.Handler` is necessary for #80

This is under-documented at best, and confusing in general. Ideally the user could name their package whatever they want, but we would have to figure out how the Pushup compiler...

Currently it exits immediately after a compilation error.

Convert the existing e2e test cases (see `TestPushup` in main_test.go) to something like [Mercurial's unified test format](https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/WritingTests).

Some valuable feedback we received after our public announcement was that file-based routing is great for getting started but doesn't scale well. To a degree we are YAGNI at this...

`man pushup` should work

https://github.com/google/safehtml