oleid comments

Results 35 comments of


                                            oleid

Incorrect generated data_size when using (nanopb_enumopt).int_size

Hello, I got a similar/related issue. I'm using a protobuf file similar to the following: ```.proto syntax = "proto3"; import "nanopb.proto"; option (nanopb_fileopt).max_count = 10; option (nanopb_fileopt).int_size = IS_16; //...

Clarification on OpenAPI usage / required / nullable.

Hello @jdemaeyer! Thank you for your reply! > So, if we were to remove the nullable: true from our definition of, say, the sunshine_30 field, the following response (an actual...

Clarification on OpenAPI usage / required / nullable.

> Regarding the code you posted, apart from the unnecessary wrapping of timestamp and source_id in Option stemming from that bug, I don't see anything wrong with it. The only...

Clarification on OpenAPI usage / required / nullable.

> > 1. The user of the API has to check if the API actually provided the field in the answer twice, so the deserialization has to do it once...

Add filename information to `std::io::Error` to improve `std::io` error messages

I was wondering : the examples in the RFC are all about files. What about socket connections which fail? How would those be rendered if this RFC passes?