Readme doesn't clarify why wrapping QC and propER is valuable.

You seem to have gotten some good results from using qc, but it's not obvious to someone coming new to this library what it provides over just using QC or propER directly. Maybe the README should say something about that.

Thank you for the feedback. However, I don't have a plan to add new documentation to this repository.

The best advice that I can offer is to start using QC and/or PropEr without this wrapper. As you learn more about QC and/or PropEr, you may find some of the code snippets in here helpful as a reference.

Sure, I'm learning PropEr now so I'm off to a start on it. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 5:17 PM Joseph Wayne Norton < [email protected]> wrote:

Thank you for the feedback. However, I don't have a plan to add new documentation to this repository.

The best advice that I can offer is to start using QC and/or PropEr without this wrapper. As you learn more about QC and/or PropEr, you may find some of the code snippets in here helpful as a reference.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/norton/qc/issues/9#issuecomment-269888451, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA8qkv0RH60RHTlE64b3Kj4CefQUg78ks5rNv6zgaJpZM4LYAdO .