• Is your feature request related to a problem?
  I would like to propose more self-explanatory exception message for case when constructor and magic factory implementation does not match.
• Explain your intentions.
  I found that it is not always clear that constructor and magic fatory are bind together using parameter names, not types. Which is logical from implementation perspective (no ambiguity), however counter-intuitive from user perspective.

originally implemented in #99

Proposal

Instead of saying just

I would say Cannot implement ..\Components\HeaderFactory::create(), because parameters ($breadcrumbs, $logout) of factory method are not matching constructor of ...\Components\Breadrumbs ($breadcrumbsComponent, $logoutComponent).

If you agree with this proposal, @grifart will send PR for this.

👍

Approved by @dg. @dakur Could you please make look at this? :)

Here we go.. #284