nf-interpreter

nf-interpreter copied to clipboard

Description

• Updating System.IO.FileSystem checksum.

Motivation and Context

The current Nuget library has a different checksum than the firmware.

How Has This Been Tested?

• Manually

Screenshots

Types of changes

• [ ] Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
• [X] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
• [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• [ ] Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
• [ ] Dev Containers (changes related with Dev Containers, has no impact on code or features)
• [ ] Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
• [ ] Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist

• [ ] My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
• [ ] My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
• [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
• [X] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• [ ] I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved file system stability and performance by updating internal assembly data.

Walkthrough

The recent update to the nf_sys_io_filesystem.cpp file involves changing the value of the g_CLR_AssemblyNative_System_IO_FileSystem constant. This update modifies the assembly identifier from 0x62EBC911 to 0xCC556D24, ensuring that the correct assembly version is referenced within the file system module.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
src/System.IO.FileSystem/nf_sys_io_filesystem.cpp	Updated the value of g_CLR_AssemblyNative_System_IO_FileSystem from 0x62EBC911 to 0xCC556D24.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Not sure why this is out of sync but I might have missed a pending PR.

Not sure why this is out of sync but I might have missed a pending PR.

If you have moved the stubs all up and changed all the files, it's the way to go :-) If you are missing a definition, then things will compile but break at execution.

Not sure why this is out of sync but I might have missed a pending PR.

If you have moved the stubs all up and changed all the files, it's the way to go :-) If you are missing a definition, then things will compile but break at execution.

I meant I wasn't sure who committed changes to System.IO.FileSystem without updating the stubs.

The current NuGet library is newer than the firmware and updating the stubs here didn't seem to break anything in my testing.

It doesn't look like previous changes to C# code have required any change to native code. Just looks like the signature has changed. So I don't see any reason not to merge this PR.