bugbug
bugbug copied to clipboard
Platform for Machine Learning projects on Software Engineering
We could include the comment message in the summarization step.
> The issue I see is in case we add a new parameter, we should make sure to include it here. Can you think of a way to assert that...
Follow-up to #4586. In addition to past bug fixes, we can add examples from past static analysis issue fixes.
Similar to #4582, but across different models. This depends on #4580 for the evaluation.
We can generate synthetic comments (and synthetic CoT, #4585) from bug fixes: take a patch that fixes a bug, go back to the patch that introduced the bug, generate a...
See http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.16452, it should improve quality. We can also use the generated CoT explanations to help people understand the generated comments and verify if they are correct. The generated CoT...
Wrong comments can make people spend a lot of time for nothing, greatly reducing the trust in the tool. The LLM as judge could have access to the same code...
Bumps python from 3.12-slim to 3.14-slim. [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a...
> All right, let's file a follow-up to move to author names _Originally posted by @marco-c in https://github.com/mozilla/bugbug/pull/5303#discussion_r2403862018_